I cannot remember when creating ink drawings of natural objects, using natural dyes instead of regular paints, first appealed… Drawing a branch, a twig, a group of leaves or some fruit, and embellishing it with what are essentially water based paints from equally natural objects like bark, seeds, leaves, roots, just feels “right”.
Natural dyes certainly give a different effect to even watercolors, although the techniques of applying them to the paper is similar to watercolor painting. Natural dye colors tend to be subtle, so you have to build up saturation and intensity through continual overpainting until the right tone is reached. But that very subtleness can add a dimension to the work that brighter colors can’t emulate. They force the viewer to really look at the piece. It also forces the artist to create a drawing that is as close to perfect as possible, as there is nowhere to hide, every mistake shows.
Here’s an example of the difference between using natural dyes and pastels: I did the following two drawings of a toadstool picked in the Sloan Gorge Preserve near Woodstock (under the care of the Woodstock Land Conservatory). With one I used natural dyes, the other pastels, to fill in the spaces and add color to the india ink drawing.
The pastel-painted picture is certainly more dramatic, but the illustration using natural dyes—onion skins, coffee/tea mix, walnut husks (dark brown), as well as ink washes – is visually more subtle as the viewer has to really look at the piece to see the shapes and indentations of the plant.